From: Telemonitoring: ethical lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
Shifting responsibilities |
Ensure explicit and realistic allocation of responsibilities |
Embed telemonitoring in a trusting care relation |
Beware of (unwarranted) big sister conceptions. Avoid expectations that monitoring is more direct and continuous than it actually is |
Empowerment and self-management |
Create opportunities for optimal form of self-management—in particular for patients with chronic conditions—and as an explicit aim of telemonitoring |
Create possibilities for meaningful conversations (i.e. about the interpretation & implication of the data, shared decision making, end of life) |
Value of f2f consultations |
Integrate telemonitoring in good clinical care practices, and preferably within an established HCP – patient trust relation |
Stimulate further research on the importance of and conditions for F2F consultations |
Appraise and determine the golden standard of quality of telemonitoring care |
Equal access and inclusivity |
Take into account vulnerability in inclusion/exclusion criteria, beware of noncompliance |
Involve patients in design and implementation processes, and consider implementation as an iterative process requiring continuous adjustment |
Stimulate careful upscaling: What works for one patient population does not automatically work for another |
Privacy and big data |
Identify the risks of the dependency on commercial companies; concerns of collection of data are beyond privacy; power of commercial parties over data collection tools and the infrastructure of clinical studies and clinical care may negatively impact the quality of care |