Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz

Original Submission
7 Jun 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
1 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart J. Nelson
14 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
21 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 8
21 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
24 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 9
24 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
24 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 10
24 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 10
25 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Daiju Ueda
Resubmission - Version 11
25 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
5 Dec 2023 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2024 Article published 10.1186/s44247-023-00058-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page