Skip to main content

Table 2 Opportunities and risks of DHAs

From: How can primary care benefit from digital health applications? – a quantitative, explorative survey on attitudes and experiences of general practitioners in Germany

  

Rotated component matrix

Question: Which of the following statements would you tend to agree with? (N = 3,829)

Overall approval

Comp. 1 (variance clarif.: 18.0%)

Comp. 2 (variance clarif.: 17.8%)

Comp. 3 (variance clarif.: 13.4%)

DHAs reinforce patient motivation to improve their health

66%

.659

.752

.034

DHAs reinforce patient compliance

55%

.443

.796

-.101

I do not think that DHAs provide adequate data privacy

45%

-.182

.002

-.769

DHAs give patients the sense of having more control over their health and keeping healthy (empowerment)

39%

.492

.198

-.096

DHAs are too complicated for many patients, which leads to health data errors being collected or treatment failure in extreme cases

37%

-.662

.513

-.162

DHAs help increase patient awareness for health and disease issues

28%

.431

.675

.366

DHAs help schedule doctors’ appointments more effectively

26%

.500

.262

-.058

DHAs make the doctor-patient relationship less personal

22%

-.220

-.448

-.103

DHAs facilitate rapid disease and disease risk recognition and diagnosis

22%

.828

.300

.146

DHAs take the burden off doctors and nursing staff as they no longer need to deal with collecting health data and measurements

20%

.116

.525

.296

DHAs cause more rather than less work for doctors, as they give doctors more responsibilities to tend to

19%

-.326

.205

.631

DHAs make it possible to reach new patient groups

19%

-.002

-.033

.025

DHAs cause floods of data not relevant or beneficial to effective treatment

18%

-.276

.186

-.705

DHAs are too time-consuming for patients and doctors to use

17%

-.197

-.469

-.101

DHAs facilitate doctor-patient communication

11%

.324

.723

.017

The additional information that DHAs collect make it possible to treat patients in a more individual and effective way

6%

.263

.527

.235

DHAs lead to patients taking their diagnosis and treatment into their own hands

4%

-.122

-.162

-.401

  1. Extraction method: Principal component analysis
  2. Rotation method: Varimax, Kaiser normalization
  3. Rotation convergence in six iterations
  4. Total variance clarified: 49.2%; sampling suitability according to Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin: .677
  5. Significance according to Bartlett: p < 0.001
  6. Communalities of all included variables above limit .5