Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimates from best-fitting models predicting self-reported adherence: both CPS conditions combined versus ATR

From: Randomized pilot trial of cell phone support to improve medication adherence among adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions

 

Estimates

95% CI

P

Estimates

95% CI

P

Estimates

95% CI

P

Dependent Variable

VAS1w

VAS2w

VAS3w

Fixed Effects

 Intercept

26.08

10.34, 41.82

0.002

23.32

6.00, 40.63

0.009

26.59

7.09, 46.09

0.008

 CPS * MidTx

-2.08

-21.95, 17.79

0.84

-6.65

-24.19, 10.90

0.46

0.32

-19.53, 20.16

0.98

 CPS * PostTx

11.45

-9.14, 32.03

0.28

10.88

-7.36, 29.13

0.24

25.80

5.62, 45.98

0.01

 CPS * Followup

-5.21

-25.89, 15.48

0.62

-6.65

-24.98, 11.69

0.48

6.12

-14.26, 26.50

0.56

Observations

118

  

118

  

116

  

AIC

993.96

  

981.97

  

984.22

  

Dependent Variable

VAS1m

VAS2m

VAS3m

Fixed Effects

 Intercept

25.35

6.95, 43.75

0.007

21.31

3.40, 39.23

0.020

26.01

8.63, 43.38

0.994

 CPS * MidTx

-9.15

-30.24, 11.95

0.40

-5.49

-24.56, 13.59

0.57

-3.09

-22.12, 15.94

0.75

 CPS * PostTx

8.59

-13.21, 30.39

0.44

15.44

-4.34, 35.23

0.13

17.70

-2.17, 37.57

0.08

 CPS * Followup

-6.43

-28.33, 15.48

0.57

-5.89

-25.79, 14.00

0.56

-5.33

-25.29, 14.64

0.60

Observations

117

  

114

  

119

  

AIC

1006.25

  

955.92

  

1003.36

  
  1. Reference groups are baseline for time and ATR for treatment