Skip to main content

Table 3 Perceived utility of VR within a hospital environment

From: Perspectives on the use of Virtual Reality within a public hospital setting: surveying knowledge, attitudes, and perceived utility among health care professionals

Category of use

Potential applications of VR technology

Example/s

N (%)

Clinical education and skill development

Simulations and workplace training

Simulated emergency response training

111 (82)

Educational clinical learning

Immersive anatomy, physiology, and/or surgical tutorials

109 (80)

Therapeutic applications

Rehabilitation or physical therapy

To enable patients to undertake physical therapy tasks in a simulated virtual environment

93 (68)

Education of patients and their families

To help explain medical conditions, surgical procedures and/or treatments to patients and their families

90 (66)

Counselling and/or psychological therapy

Delivery of graded exposure therapy, in a virtual environment

77 (56)

Surgical procedures

To assist with planning and/or conducting complex procedures

71 (52)

Pain management

As an adjunct form of analgesia for people with painful conditions (e.g. phantom limb pain) or during painful procedures (e.g. dressing changes)

68 (51)

Othera

- Virtual, end of life experiences (such as visiting remote locations) in Palliative Care

- Diversional therapy

- Dementia care

- For virtual care interactions between patients and providers

14 (10)

Logistical, design and infrastructure

Hospital tours/hospital orientation

Conducting virtual hospital orientation for patients and/or visitors

64 (47)

Familiarisation to clinical environments

Familiarising patients to radiological equipment prior to receiving scans and/or treatment

58 (42)

Hospital design and planning

For viewing and appraising proposed hospital renovations and redesign plans

55 (40)

None

No possible uses

-

2 (1)

  1. Participants were asked to identify ways they perceived VR could be used and beneficial in a hospital environment. N refers to the number of participants (out of n = 136 total respondents) who selected each option. Participants could select multiple options; therefore, the total number of responses is larger than the number of participants
  2. aOther beneficial applications were those identified by participants that did not appear in the multiple-choice list of responses